Argumentative Essay Sample on Euthanasia: My Personal Opinion. Samples Euthanasia is a serious political, moral and ethical issue in today’s society. Most people either strictly forbid it or firmly favor euthanasia. Although, I have no political background or confirmed religion, I choose to formally educate myself on the matter of euthanasia. I feel very strongly about this Dec 01, · Euthanasia, active or passive, should never be made legal. It weakens society’s respect for the sanctity of life. Secondly, allowing it will lead to worse care for the terminally ill. Finally, the gray area surrounding its usage will be abused if it is made legal. Euthanasia weakens society’s respect for the sanctity of life Euthanasia Essay Words | 8 Pages Euthanasia - Response to Anti Euthanasia Essay Euthanasia is a topic that provokes as much controversy as capital punishment, primarily because it is irreversible. The question of euthanasia being right or wrong is one that most would prefer left alone
Argumentative Essay In Favor of Euthanasia Essay - Academicscope
Special offer! Promo code: SAVE One of the greatest debates surrounding the topic of euthanasia revolves around its legalization. The legality of euthanasia has spurred a lot of debate due to the rise in cases of terminal illnesses such as cancer. There are people who support legalization of the procedure while there are others who strongly condemn it, terming it as intentional killing.
Despite the argument put across by both sides, euthanasia is legally and morally wrong since it disregards the value of human life, euthanasia debate essay. Euthanasia should be condemned by all means necessary since it involves ending the life of euthanasia debate essay human being.
Any country that upholds Christian or any other religious values should make laws that prohibit the practice. In the same breadth, by allowing euthanasia, medical practitioners are given too much power to kill. Doctors are given the right to kill in what is commonly referred to as playing God. In the modern days, doctors are taking self-centered interests in making money or making things go their way.
In Netherlands for example, euthanasia debate essay, many patients die every year due to physician-assisted killing whether it was without consent or not Reichlin, Euthanasia also destroys the normal doctor-patient relationship. Frequently, a patient seeks a doctor because he or she knows that the doctor will do anything to save their life. However, if euthanasia is euthanasia debate essay, then patients may distrust the doctors. Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath that makes it clear that they should treat their patients to the best of their ability, alleviate pain, and protect life.
Legalizing mercy killing would go against the very oath through which doctors are sworn in. Further, euthanasia goes against the sanctity of human life.
Moral ethics dictate that nobody should intentionally terminate the life of another person or their own life Goligher et al. The foundation that the worth of the human person is both intrinsic and incalculable Goligher et al. In line with this foundation, human life should only be lost naturally but not intentionally, euthanasia debate essay.
In essence, no matter the side of the debate one is, all can agree to the fact that euthanasia is a form of murder. Both parties to the debate may present arguments but what remains clear is that life will be lost. In the past, some terminally ill patients had survived even when medical reports indicated that they would not survive. Therefore, it would be selfish and wrong to end the life of a patient based on a medical report.
Individuals who are for mercy killing agree that sometimes miracles do happen where terminally ill patients survive Attell, Therefore, euthanasia debate essay, every patient no matter their level of pain should be given a chance to live or die in peace.
Sometimes a patient may consent to mercy killing due to the amount of pain that they are going through. However, in the recent past, there have been technological advancements that tend to help to ease pain. As a result, killing a patient on the basis of ending their pain is slowly becoming a thing of the past.
No medical practitioner should play God by deciding who lives and who dies no matter the level of consent given, euthanasia debate essay. Euthanasia debate essay who are in a coma and had not indicated whether they wish to die or not, have the right to keep on going with their lives until they die naturally.
That should be left unto God to decide, euthanasia debate essay. Most of the times, patients who claim to be euthanized do so out of pain, suffering, and medical costs. Here, they may feel as if they are a burden to their relatives euthanasia debate essay therefore desire to die with an aim of cutting down on the expenses. However, the truth is every person desires to see their relative up to the last point of their life.
In case such a patient is taken through mercy killing, the relatives will live with a guilty conscious wondering whether their loved one could have survived if they were not given the lethal injection. By all means possible, the life of a patient should be preserved and no person should decide when it ends, euthanasia debate essay.
The existence of palliative care and technological advancements in the medical industry proves that euthanasia is wrong, euthanasia debate essay.
Although there are both sides of the debate on the practice, a common agreement between the two groups is that it involves killing a patient. In such instances, doctors decide to play God and administer a lethal injection that ends the life of a patient. Although a patient may decide to receive the lethal dose, they do so out of pain and suffering, and sometimes out of concern for the medical costs involved in their care, euthanasia debate essay.
No matter the argument put across by any group, euthanasia remains what it is: killing an innocent patient. It is morally wrong. Attell, B. Changing attitudes toward euthanasia and suicide for terminally ill persons, to an age-period-cohort analysis.
OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying Goligher, E. Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the intensive care unit: A dialogue on core ethical issues. Crit Care Med. Saul, H. Sulmasy, D. Non-faith-based arguments against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.
The Linacre Quarterly, 83 3 Thesis: Despite the argument put across by both sides of the debate, euthanasia is legally and morally wrong since it disregards the value of human life. In summary, the existence of palliative care and technological advancements euthanasia debate essay the medical industry proves that euthanasia is wrong.
Although there are both sides of the debate on euthanasia a common agreement between the two groups is that it involves killing a patient. com is a leading academic writing service that is dedicated to providing extra support and help to students all over the world. Through our website, students can request for help in a diverse range of subjects and disciplines.
We understand that studies are the foundation of success; euthanasia debate essay they can be quite a challenge without extra help. Ours, therefore, is to pick up where your lecturers stop by providing you with a reliable process for meeting your academic needs. Do My Essay! Do not waste euthanasia debate essay. Get a complete paper today.
Order essays, research papers, euthanasia debate essay, term papers, euthanasia debate essay reviews, assignments, dissertation, euthanasia debate essay, thesis Read more…. Euthanasia Argumentative Essay Sample Published by gudwriter on May 27, May 27, No Bullshit!!
Get A Custom Essay Special offer! Categories: Free Essays and Research Papers. Tags: Examples of Argumentative Essays Free Euthanasia Essays. gudwriter Gudwriter. Related Posts Free Essays and Research Papers Descriptive Essay about the Beach, How to Guide, Examples Do My Essay! Free Essays and Research Papers Personal Reflection Essay for Trip to a Hindu Temple Essay Do My Euthanasia debate essay Free Essays and Research Papers Parenting Style Essay Do My Essay!
Should Euthanasia Be Legal?
, time: 6:48Euthanasia Argumentative Essay Sample - blogger.com
Those in favour of euthanasia argue that it should be up to the patient, whereas those against argue that euthanasia could be misused, leading to very disturbing situations. A strong ethical argument against the use of euthanasia is that it could soon become a slippery slope, with the legalisation of involuntary euthanasia following it May 27, · Argumentative Essay on Euthanasia Outline. Introduction. Thesis: Despite the argument put across by both sides of the debate, euthanasia is legally and morally wrong since it disregards the value of human life. Body. Paragraph 1: Euthanasia should be condemned by all means necessary since it involves ending the life of a human blogger.comted Reading Time: 6 mins Mar 28, · Argumentative Essay In Favor of Euthanasia Essay “Euthanasia is the administration of a lethal agent by another person to a patient for the purpose of relieving the patient’s intolerable and incurable suffering”. When we talk about euthanasia it is meant as a means to help someone to achieve a good blogger.comted Reading Time: 6 mins
No comments:
Post a Comment